This story of course notes that the bicyclist was not wearing a helmet. Which I’m sure is what caused the motorist to fail to yield the right of way.
Vehicle charges likely in bicycle accident
Bicyclist hospitalized after Saratoga Springs accident
By DENNIS YUSKO, Staff writer
First published: Tuesday, June 9, 2009
SARATOGA SPRINGS — A 30-year-old man was taken to the hospital with head injuries on Sunday after he struck a car while riding his bicycle on Broadway, police say.
The man, who police did not identify, was riding north at 1:22 p.m., when he hit the rear passenger door of a vehicle turning left into the parking lot of Lillian’s restaurant, Lt. Matthew Veitch said.
The bicyclist was not wearing a helmet and was transported to a hospital with non-life threatening injuries, Veitch said.
The operator of the vehicle, who police would only say is from Vermont, will likely face charges of failing to yield the right of way, police said.
“The investigation is ongoing and charges are anticipated,” Veitch said.
This article is available at the Times Union site.
I sent a follow-up email message to the author of the piece, Dennis Yusko (dyusko@timesunion.com):
Hi Dennis,
As a local cyclist, let me begin by saying thanks for covering any bicycle stories at all, even when they’re accidents.
A quick question: Why is it that the cyclist’s lack of a helmet is mentioned before the motorist’s failure to yield the right of way? (I might go further and ask why the helmet is in the story at all.) Surely the cyclist’s lack of a helmet is not what caused the driver to hit the cyclist. Shouldn’t the charges against the driver come first?
Helmets are great, but every cycling accident story tells the reader whether or not the cyclist had one, as if this had anything to do with the cause of the accident.
Thanks again for your time and for paying attention to cyclists.
All the best,
Jason